HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 23:37
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 465
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.3% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 47.6
48% 53.6 fps
MRender 44.4
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 50.6
40% 48.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 128G 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 230 234 238 238 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 311
Write 225
Mixed 195
SusWrite 234
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 17.2
83% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 92.8
96% 153 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST500DM002-1BD142 160GB
97GB free
Firmware: GJ001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 79 77 79 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 87.4
Write 83.2
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 77.5
49% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback