Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 19:29
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 262
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 854
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,047
65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1425 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 75
Parallax 92.3
59% 79.8 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 60.1
55% 68.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
582GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 445 447 452 450 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 450
Mixed 378
SusWrite 448
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 47.5
163% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 188
141% 188 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
467GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 146 149 150 148 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 125
Mixed 105
SusWrite 149
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 158 157 158 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 128
Mixed 108
SusWrite 157
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95%
Great: 100%
Asmedia ASM1053E 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 32.8
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 21.9
24% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 107%
ST ST3000DM001-1E61 3TB
3TB free, PID 1e40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 37.7
Write 37.2
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 21
43% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1.1
285% 3.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2866 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 31.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 29.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback