Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 09:28
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 156
2-Core 308
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,112
102% 856 Pts
64-Core 1,478
91% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 78.6
52% 69.5 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 52.6
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,131
Write 1,262
Mixed 1,139
264% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 63
220% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,291
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1,162
873% 1,169 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 291%
Viper M.2 VPN100 512GB
319GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1486
Write 1,939
Mixed 1,544
372% 1,656 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 67.9
234% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,367
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 1,259
933% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 253%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 162
Mixed 69.4
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
168GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.9
Write 55.8
Mixed 59.1
48% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
334GB free, PID 024f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 134
Mixed 79.1
151% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 69%
I-O DATA HDH-USR 250GB
26GB free, PID 0116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.2
Write 11
Mixed 19.8
25% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
I-O DATA HDCS-U 1TB
931GB free, PID 0121
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.5
Write 22.8
Mixed 31.2
37% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 21%
I-O DATA HDCR-U 2TB
213GB free, PID 012e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.2
Write 30.6
Mixed 20.3
35% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 37.6
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 37.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $1,056
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback