Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 00:20
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 283
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,130
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 2,138
132% 2,138 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 149
Parallax 158
127% 154 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 130
Splatting 107
111% 140 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 211 59 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 930
Mixed 875
SusWrite 226
189% 853 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 76.4
273% 99.7 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 220
276% 470 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 180%
Great: 209%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
142GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 198 201 110 182 231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 412
Write 278
Mixed 299
SusWrite 193
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 42.7
158% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 254
199% 274 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 220 226 223 225 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Lacie 4Big Quadra v3 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 051E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 145 146 147 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 136
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 144
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
358% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 108%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 38.2
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 36.2
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback