Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '19 at 23:49
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,145
103% 869 Pts
64-Core 2113
131% 2113 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 175
Parallax 185
149% 181 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 157
Splatting 110
122% 155 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 853 822 313 162 56 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 925
Mixed 872
SusWrite 392
198% 888 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 76.4
275% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 219
273% 465 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 189%
Great: 209%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
144GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 219 205 158 144 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 399
Write 290
Mixed 286
SusWrite 198
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 40.5
153% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 248
195% 270 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 94%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 475 480 479 481 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 480
Mixed 422
SusWrite 477
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 41.8
141% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 271
196% 256 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
6TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 225 225 227 225 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Lacie 4Big Quadra v3 12TB
4TB free
Firmware: 051E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 236 239 240 242 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 208
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 236
131% 181 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
396% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 93 90 92 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 72
Write 87
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 92.9
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
168% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 37.5
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 33.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback