Asus Maximus IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 06:23
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 611
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 139
Parallax 111
110% 128 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 132
Splatting 108
112% 142 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 40 35 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 474
Write 414
Mixed 378
SusWrite 70.3
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 50.8
172% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 142
116% 164 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
92GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 57.4
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 116 113 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 114
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.7
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback