Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 826
75% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,149
71% 1,149 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.3% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 84.2
54% 72.9 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 56.9
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 52 109 39 91 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 462
Write 356
Mixed 347
SusWrite 82.3
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 36.1
141% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 196
176% 266 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 90%
Intenso Sata III 507GB
318GB free
Firmware: R0411D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 397 396 396 398 391 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 391
Mixed 318
SusWrite 396
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 36.7
126% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 208
179% 262 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 104%
Intenso SATAIII 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 470 438 429 431 421 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 448
Mixed 399
SusWrite 443
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 51.8
175% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 121
158% 283 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 118%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $671
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback