Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory	8.7 GB free of 10.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100804
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '19 at 19:09
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 78.4 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 85.3 46% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 84.5 8-Core 85.6 11% 85.1 Pts	64-Core 85.1 5% 85.1 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.76% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.28 4% 4.34 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.76% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120 120GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0616A SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 41 104 66 66 66 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.5% Below average	Read 240 Write 209 Mixed 183 SusWrite 83.5 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 11.4 78% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 16.2 22% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 52GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 85 84 88 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 144 Write 136 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 86.1 70% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 626GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 85 84 88 88 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	53% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 116 Mixed 60.6 SusWrite 86 66% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 46GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	227x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	49x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	37x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	231x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	62x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	32x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	9x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	8x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 44GBUnknownBench 21%, 16 samples	6x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16