Samsung 530U4E/540U4E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung 530U4E/540U4E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP530U4E-X02PT
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140226
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 66
2-Core 88.4
49% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 173
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0E8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.17
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 294
Mixed 263
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 24.4
78% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 66.2
DQ Mixed 40.9
34% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Sandisk i100 24GB
7GB free
Firmware: 11.56.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 79 84 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 344
Write 74.8
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 81.2
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.7
40% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 11.9
10% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 31%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 37
Write 37.7
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 38.6
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
179% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
13GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 21
Mixed 22
SusWrite 3.6
24% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.8
162% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U4E/540U4E Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U4E/540U4E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback