Asus G750JZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G750JZ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JZ
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '19 at 13:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 522
57% 453 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 157D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 7.06
3% 14.8 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.22
6% 6.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC100S37128G 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 191 192 192 85 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 443
Write 194
Mixed 200
SusWrite 151
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 17.6
83% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 20.1
20% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 68%
Liteon CV3-DE512 512GB
140GB free
Firmware: TD96201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 362 226 211 226 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 449
Write 406
Mixed 354
SusWrite 275
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 36.7
128% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 34.9
30% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JZ Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback