Intel S2600CWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel S2600CWR  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 17:26
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 56
2-Core 112
53% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 433
38% 321 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 3.66
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 294 301 298 301 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 454
Mixed 436
SusWrite 298
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 46
152% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 244
209% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 197 197 182 192 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 210
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 194
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 91 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 93.2
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 91.9
115% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965596-043.B00G 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84% Excellent
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 30.8
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CWR Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Intel S2600CWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback