HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 13:54
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 498
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4889
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.37
Reflection 5.96
Parallax 6.53
3% 5.29 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.43
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 CT500MX50 500GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 55 68 90 64 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 347
Write 324
Mixed 281
SusWrite 68.2
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 10.6
28% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 145
120% 168 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback