Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55-UD3L  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101101
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 01 '16 at 16:26
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 163
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 322
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4144
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 29.2
20% 25.5 fps
MRender 32.8
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 24.3
21% 26.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
632GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 163
Mixed 160
122% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.35
101% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
143GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 128
Write 135
Mixed 112
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.21
95% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55-UD3L Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback