Pegatron A15W8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPegatron A15W8  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON A15W8
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 01 '16 at 08:40
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 132
61% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 188
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1B0A 20C5) 772MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2626
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.46
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.38 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.1. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.8% Poor
Read 244
Write 172
Mixed 200
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 9.27
4K Write 9.19
4K Mixed 5.27
26% 7.91 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 8.32
10% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KSN-2G 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A15W8 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron A15W8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback