MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 19:56
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 42.3
28% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 74.6
8-Core 84.7
10% 79.6 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 34%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
MSI(1462 328D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 57
Parallax 64
37% 55.3 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 71.4
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 182 227 205 109 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 344
Write 175
Mixed 250
SusWrite 166
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 16.1
64% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 95.4
76% 107 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
483GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 151 137 134 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 160
Write 179
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 150
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback