Asus GL502VMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL502VMK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VMK
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161123
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 00:14
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 210
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 547
58% 462 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1800) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 56.8
51% 63.5 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 68
54% 65.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 Pro 512GB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 361 387 387 394 390 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 418
Write 297
Mixed 320
SusWrite 371
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 17.3
89% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 98.5
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 23.2
70% 145 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 13.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VMK Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus GL502VMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback