HP Laptop 15q-by0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15q-by0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8331
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 15:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 107
48% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 100
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 520
HP(103C 8331) 2GB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 19.10.08.01
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 10.9
5% 8.58 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 8.63
Splatting 6.74
5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RSM8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 57 45 60 64 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 86.9
Write 95.9
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 54.3
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15q-by0xx Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15q-by0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback