MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 01:15
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 205
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 580
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 440.23
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.19
Parallax 4.06
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.77
Splatting 6.04
4% 4.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
AMD HD 6870
Asus(1043 03C6) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 14
Parallax 19.9
16% 17.9 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 18.6
13% 14.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 126 73 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 424
Write 410
Mixed 369
SusWrite 138
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 35.4
123% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 353
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 121%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
442GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 88 89 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 85
Write 83.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 88
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
222% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
DELL RD1000 160GB
99GB free, PID 1120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 27.7
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 27.9
37% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
ICY BOX BOX IB-3620 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 35 33 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 40.5
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 35.7
52% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20%
Great: 57%
LaCie Rugged USB-C 2TB
831GB free, PID 108c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 94 104 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 90.5
Write 102
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 101
124% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 52%
ICY BOX BOX IB-3620 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 5 4.7 4.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 4.8
36% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $753
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback