Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 17:26
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 226
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 442
59% 439 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 22.7
19% 21.1 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.2
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 127 129 166 209 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 320
Write 86.6
Mixed 84
SusWrite 167
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 8.7
40% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 9905474-043.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback