Asus K53TA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K53TA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53TA
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 04:59
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3400M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 75.9
40% 61 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 136
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Asus(1043 107C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.56
3% 3.38 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 4.13
3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 356 366 351 352 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68% Good
Read 386
Write 371
Mixed 318
SusWrite 353
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 18.4
66% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 193
157% 223 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-056.A00G Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53TA Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53TA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback