| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120809 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 27 '19 at 22:53 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59%
Above average
|
51% 79.8 Pts
|
29% 233 Pts
|
18% 282 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.1
|
30.3%
Below average
|
31% 39.5 fps
|
29% 34.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 69 72 73 81 84 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
57% 78.3 MB/s
|
155% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
GB0500C4413 500GB
229GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 67 66 65 66 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
46% 62.4 MB/s
|
153% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
USB2.0 Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 1172
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 4.9 4.8 5 5 4.8 MB/s
|
4.73%
Terrible
|
11% 9.55 MB/s
|
11% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.4%
Poor
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
54% 74.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 181 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 34x |
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 32x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 15x |
| GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 8x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $446 |