TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Blade Pro
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 21:27
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 331
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 65.4%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Device(1A58 674C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3160
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 17.7
15% 17.3 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 23
Splatting 17
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 15.6%
 Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-00000 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 33 29 31 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 304
Write 48
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 32.1
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 19.2
62% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 36.7
DQ Mixed 56.7
58% 98.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 39%
 Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
122GB free
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 71 79 77 76 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 71
Write 72.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 76.8
45% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 42.5%
 Great: 58%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 94 108 110 103 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 111
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 106
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 57%
 Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 15.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 50.8%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples125x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples93x
Core i7-4700HQIntel  $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples31x
GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples121x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples62x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples59x
SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples34x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples32x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples24x
RAM
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GBMicronBench 86%, 409 samples81x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples61x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples45x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback