Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Blade Pro
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '19 at 04:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 130
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 303
29% 240 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Device(1A58 674C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3160
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 17.6
13% 16.5 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 17.2
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-00000 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 149 143 133 118 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 387
Write 95.5
Mixed 130
SusWrite 130
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 21.2
89% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 71.6
93% 175 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
122GB free
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 74 78 74 77 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 72.5
Write 65.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 73.3
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 128 126 125 127 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 106
Write 123
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 126
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
198% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback