Acrsys ACRPRDCT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcrsys ACRPRDCT  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 17:41
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4300
uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 58.6
36% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 59.8
8-Core 59
8% 59.4 Pts
64-Core 59.5
4% 59.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Famille de jeu de puces Express Mobile Intel 45
Acer(1025 020E)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.38
1% 0.61 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 0.96
0% 0.46 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 50 50 51 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 55
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 50
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ACRPRDCT Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acrsys ACRPRDCT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback