Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 16:53
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 182
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 556
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 31.7
23% 34.5 fps
MRender 43.6
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 32.7
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 228GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 902
Write 842
Mixed 375
156% 707 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 43.4
150% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 243
214% 319 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 119%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$86
143GB free
Firmware: CV11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 121
Mixed 38
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 98%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
69GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,754
Write 32.5
Mixed 64
919% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 419
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.1
17,718% 141 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 108%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
266GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 131
Mixed 70
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
294GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 101
Mixed 68
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.3
Write 6
Mixed 2.5
11% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 34%
ADATA HD700 1TB
345GB free, PID a61a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,910
Write 13.7
Mixed 22.8
877% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 420
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
1,640% 141 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 44.8
MC Mixed 43.1
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback