Positivo POS-EIH61CE

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Positivo POS-EIH61CE (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-EIH61CE
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '19 at 11:09
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 173 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 328 43% 321 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.8% Average	Lighting 58.9 Reflection 63 Parallax 75.2 48% 65.7 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 59.2 Splatting 52.3 48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
VSFB18CC128G-RAD 127GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1024-000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 228 214 202 168 234 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.5% Good	Read 251 Write 231 Mixed 210 SusWrite 207 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 35 114% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 150 123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 386GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 143 140 144 142 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 142 Write 96.9 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 143 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GB 12,132 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-EIH61CE Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EIH61CE

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	46x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	35x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	33x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	117x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	38x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x

RAM
SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 2x4GBSmartBench 47%, 391 samples	12x
SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 1x4GBSmartBench 26%, 348 samples	10x
76.B146G.C340C 2x4GBUnknownBench 46%, 100 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $77

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16