Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 00:30
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 117
52% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 384
48% 365 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 65.5
45% 65.4 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 60.7
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 32 77 79 47 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 450
Write 191
Mixed 226
SusWrite 59.4
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 15.4
85% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 15.9
40% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 72%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
2GB free
Firmware: 1D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75
Write 74
Mixed 73.5
56% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS54501 120GB
26GB free
Firmware: C64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 42 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 62.8
Write 58.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 40.9
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 40%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
2TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 112 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 111
131% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback