Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 22:49
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 91.8
45% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 149
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2201.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 10
6% 8.79 fps
MRender 7.14
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 8.83
6% 7.78 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Merc ury EXTREME Pro 480GB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 256 260 273 271 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 308
Write 293
Mixed 240
SusWrite 267
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 7.6
24% 7.73 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 182
144% 201 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XN-WIFI Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XN-WIFI - $118

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback