Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory34.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime4 Days
Run DateOct 28 '16 at 13:58
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 169
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 653
58% 492 Pts
64-Core 1,662
103% 1,662 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4991) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7306
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.5% Very good
Lighting 99
Reflection 105
Parallax 93.8
81% 99.1 fps
MRender 87.8
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 75.5
68% 84.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 473
Write 255
Mixed 401
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 13.5
87% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 34.7
DQ Mixed 13.4
14% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 116%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
29GB free
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 195
Write 57.5
Mixed 91
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 8.85
73% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 52
DQ Mixed 22.9
21% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
854GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 78.1
Write 93.3
Mixed 73.3
61% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.18
89% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
490GB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 74.1
Write 66.2
Mixed 71
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.33
94% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
468GB free
Firmware: 1D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 99
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.24
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.56
157% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 76%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 7.09
Mixed 8.81
13% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.28
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.005
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-P 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback