Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150212
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '16 at 04:53
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 142 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 432 42% 347 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7563 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Lighting 85.4 Reflection 85.4 Parallax 72.7 70% 81.2 fps	MRender 76 Gravity 80.5 Splatting 77 64% 77.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 289GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1358 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 468 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 38 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 60 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5106460156	89.4% Excellent	Read 474 Write 376 Mixed 402 93% 417 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 37.1 130% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 74.9 79% 133 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 37GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5551 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1163 (B1) Unknown 98 98 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 51 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 2244 (EB) Unknown 99 99 192 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18003791953	68.1% Good	Read 472 Write 158 Mixed 337 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 23.5 108% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 64.6 74% 130 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 126%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 422GB free, PID 8561 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 57.8 Write 65.1 Mixed 64.3 82% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.32 67% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 45%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 307GB free, PID 8561 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 180 Write 146 Mixed 129 187% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.22 69% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x8GB 3,126 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 19.2 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 14 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16