Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRL-i
Memory123.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '19 at 04:55
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
CPU1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 196
64% 118 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 622
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 2,711
168% 2,711 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.7% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 62
35% 56 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 56
47% 57.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 950GB
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 823 826 826 835 817 723 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,037
Write 830
Mixed 664
SusWrite 808
187% 835 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 56.7
193% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 421
316% 420 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 169%
Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392A4K40BM0-CRC 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 24.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 19.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback