Apple MacBookPro15,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937A206F2EE63C01
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 05:31
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 253
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 603
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Apple(106B 018F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1004 MHz, MLim: 1470 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 32.4
22% 28.3 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 27.8
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 177.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,031
Write 1,190
Mixed 1,317
265% 1179 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 48.1
154% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 1,047
781% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Hfs512g3 9MND-3510A 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 3103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 364 351 363 360 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 330
Write 354
Mixed 309
SusWrite 362
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 20.4
70% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 95.6
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 96.1
71% 93.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.4
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback