Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2V
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 04:57
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 209
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 340
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teutons 120GB 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1205B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 58 68 67 68 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 500
Write 369
Mixed 213
SusWrite 71.8
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 21
121% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 31.9
72% 145 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
331GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 137 161 161 163 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 155
Write 134
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 158
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 107%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
394GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 102 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 71.5
Write 92
Mixed 85
SusWrite 102
124% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-014.A00G 017A 78.BAGN8.40C0B 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2V-CF Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2V-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback