Acer Veriton M275

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M275  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M275
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 12:17
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 92.5
47% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 93.8
8-Core 94.4
13% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 94.2
6% 94.2 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 0407) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.62
1% 0.62 fps
MRender 0.52
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.74
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 120 120 127 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 100
Write 120
Mixed 55
SusWrite 123
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 74%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
594GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 25
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 24.1
29% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF None GU502203EP0201 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M275 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback