| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (all builds) |
| Memory | 28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20171227 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 18 '19 at 22:54 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
55% 89.6 Pts
|
26% 208 Pts
|
17% 278 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
80.2%
Excellent
|
56% 127 fps
|
127% 157 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
78.6%
Very good
|
82% 28.8 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
55% 72.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,181 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 4,603x |
| Core i5-6600KIntel $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 854x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 604x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 999x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 899x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 476x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $707 |