HP Compaq 6910p (GH719AW#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 6910p (GH719AW#ABA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30C1
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 22:14
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$90
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 36.4
32% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 44.1
8-Core 48.4
6% 46.2 Pts
64-Core 43.6
3% 43.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST980825AS 80GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 18 25 23 16 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 16.8
Write 25.2
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 19.4
13% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback