Acer Predator G5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5910
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '16 at 23:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$126
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 465
52% 409 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7557
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 38.8
37% 42.4 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 35.5
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 408
Mixed 417
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 42.1
140% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 125
128% 214 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 104%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
802GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 75.8
Write 72.1
Mixed 129
71% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.18
67% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Other RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C7 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G5910 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback