Performance Results


Gaming 160% UFO	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 150% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '19 at 08:29
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 156 2-Core 312 102% 187 Pts	4-Core 614 8-Core 988 98% 801 Pts	64-Core 1,270 79% 1,270 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% PNY(196E 12FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	155% Outstanding	Lighting 215 Reflection 231 Parallax 218 175% 221 fps	MRender 248 Gravity 209 Splatting 144 158% 200 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 243 235 229 223 222 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 2,168 Write 1,466 Mixed 553 SusWrite 281 246% 1,117 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 190 4K Mixed 56.8 243% 97.7 MB/s	DQ Read 871 DQ Write 1,271 DQ Mixed 570 571% 904 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 311GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2455 2131 1063 1073 1073 1068 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	353% Outstanding	Read 2,522 Write 2,432 Mixed 1,665 SusWrite 1,477 454% 2,024 MB/s	4K Read 65.3 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 92.1 306% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,595 DQ Write 1429 DQ Mixed 1,502 1,129% 1,509 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 353% Great: 372%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OAC70 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 190 199 199 195 199 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 194 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 196 114% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC 029E CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 029E CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	81% Excellent	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 24.7 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 24.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	51x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	72x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	26x

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $590

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16