Acer AOD257

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AOD257  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE06_PT
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 19:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
24.8% Poor
Memory 46
1-Core 7.2
2-Core 14.6
19% 22.6 Pts
4-Core 23.9
8-Core 23.8
3% 23.8 Pts
64-Core 24.3
2% 24.3 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 111 110 111 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 202
Write 111
Mixed 136
SusWrite 110
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 16.2
54% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 42.9
DQ Mixed 35
27% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 393955353432382D3031312E4130324C46 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback