Asrock X370M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 115
2-Core 225
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 634
66% 533 Pts
64-Core 869
54% 869 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 58.6
54% 64 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 66.3
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 235 139 108 94 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,076
Write 1,231
Mixed 859
SusWrite 200
188% 842 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 66.6
231% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 269
286% 474 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 153%
Great: 255%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
205GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 238 235 255 279 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 455
Mixed 390
SusWrite 262
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 57.5
186% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
WD WD1500HLHX-01JJPV0 150GB
139GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 105 105 112 124 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 129
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 113
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.3
254% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ES22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 109 98 140 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 129
Write 116
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 120
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.9 4 3.8 3.8 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 4
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 4.3
9% 7.57 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBLFU240B02 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 27.3
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback