Asrock X370M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '19 at 01:39
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 229
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 712
69% 570 Pts
64-Core 958
59% 958 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 60.4
56% 66 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 70
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 824 119 122 106 103 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,428
Write 1,580
Mixed 1,078
SusWrite 230
242% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 78
272% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 269
335% 583 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 188%
Great: 255%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
205GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 292 292 293 293 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 480
Mixed 426
SusWrite 312
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 60.1
201% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
WD WD1500HLHX-01JJPV0 150GB
139GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 134 135 136 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 125
Mixed 91.9
SusWrite 134
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.3
257% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 81%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.1 4 2.9 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Read 14
Write 3.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 4.3
9% 7.43 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBLFU240B02 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 26.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback