Asrock Z87E-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z87E-ITX  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 15:28
Run Duration405 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 216
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 574
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 69
Parallax 61.5
55% 66.2 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 64
Splatting 53.7
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 191 185 193 154 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 471
Mixed 346
SusWrite 180
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 52.6
174% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
367GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 187 196 201 201 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 472
Mixed 384
SusWrite 195
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 55.5
182% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
319GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 329 321 347 345 346 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 974
Write 643
Mixed 461
SusWrite 335
134% 603 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 34.9
122% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 186
190% 293 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 113%
Great: 332%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
125GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 185 180 188 191 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 447
Mixed 403
SusWrite 186
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 46.1
153% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 304
241% 336 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
95GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 99 88 87 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 388
Write 270
Mixed 197
SusWrite 91.5
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 21.5
76% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 100
82% 117 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 91%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
568GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 88 91 89 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 85.4
Write 84.4
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 90.1
98% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 44%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00TMA0 500GB
66GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 53 52 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 51.8
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 52.3
68% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 52 53 52 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 105
Write 112
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 52.5
108% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 41%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
3TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 116 121 118 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 135
Write 144
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 118
160% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
2TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 39 60 67 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 118
Write 124
Mixed 81
SusWrite 57.9
125% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 85 83 84 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 163
Write 167
Mixed 125
SusWrite 87.5
180% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 1600 C7 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87E-ITX Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87E-ITX - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback