Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 48.3 2-Core 84.3 46% 69.6 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 119 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 2.66 3% 3.88 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 7.35 4% 4.78 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 93 152 115 151 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 453 Write 385 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 161 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.3 32% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 859B CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.2% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.9 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	167x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	16x
GeForce GT620MNvidiaBench 3%, 886 samples	5x

SSD
i100 24GBSandiskBench 28%, 942 samples	20x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 808 samples	39x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F BA92-09550A 6GBElpidaBench 41%, 139 samples	11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 276 samples	9x

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225