Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory	376.2 GB free of 384 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180523
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '19 at 03:54
Run Duration	322 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: 34 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 179 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 516 55% 437 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 2261) 3GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.7.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Lighting 53.7 Reflection 36 Parallax 67.4 44% 52.4 fps	MRender 33.3 Gravity 55 Splatting 44.4 36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 39%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63% Good	Lighting 78.5 Reflection 79 Parallax 75.8 64% 77.7 fps	MRender 73.8 Gravity 73.2 Splatting 75.7 61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 101 73 70 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 511 Write 429 Mixed 353 SusWrite 97.8 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 41.6 145% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 350 265% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 82GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 171 179 184 192 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 390 Write 408 Mixed 266 SusWrite 171 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 35.9 139% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 318 241% 324 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 106%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$250 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2065 2111 2099 1922 1119 1130 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 1,719 Write 2,106 Mixed 1,578 SusWrite 1,741 404% 1,786 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 99.6 4K Mixed 63.3 206% 70.1 MB/s	DQ Read 589 DQ Write 397 DQ Mixed 538 389% 508 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 371%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 159 157 159 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 174 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 157 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 365% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 109 109 110 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 146 Write 144 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 109 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.2 289% 2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 991GB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 153 158 164 155 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 173 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 158 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3.5TB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 198 196 198 202 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 184 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 199 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.5 187% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 109 110 110 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71% Very good	Read 138 Write 140 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 109 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 296% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 110 110 111 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 108 110 111 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 161 Write 126 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 108 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 136 137 137 138 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 136 Write 85.9 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 135 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF Samsung... 384GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 34.8 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	5x
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	4x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $250Bench 290%, 10,709 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GBSamsungBench 52%, 85 samples	4x
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hyn... 384GBSamsungBench 83%, 6 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16