Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory	375.9 GB free of 384 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180523
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '19 at 00:44
Run Duration	323 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: 34 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 171 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 565 57% 462 Pts	64-Core 891 55% 891 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 75%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Lighting 79 Reflection 80.2 Parallax 68.9 64% 76.1 fps	MRender 74 Gravity 73.8 Splatting 75.8 61% 74.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 60%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 418.91 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.8% Above average	Lighting 29.5 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 185 24% 81.7 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 189 Splatting 129 120% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 145 150 143 139 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 510 Write 467 Mixed 354 SusWrite 145 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 41.6 143% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 348 262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 61GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 162 161 157 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 388 Write 402 Mixed 269 SusWrite 160 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 36.2 138% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 316 240% 324 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 106%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1796 1795 1784 1796 1454 1152 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	252% Outstanding	Read 1,711 Write 2,106 Mixed 1,584 SusWrite 1,629 397% 1,758 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 98.9 4K Mixed 61.8 201% 68.8 MB/s	DQ Read 570 DQ Write 390 DQ Mixed 529 382% 496 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 252% Great: 371%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 158 155 158 155 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 175 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 156 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 376% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 108 107 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 144 Write 143 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 108 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 278% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 799GB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 153 156 164 157 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 149 Write 143 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 158 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.4 183% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 148 150 148 155 148 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 153 Write 150 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 150 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.5 184% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 107 108 107 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 138 Write 139 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 108 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 299% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 108 108 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 150 Write 147 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 108 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 287% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 109 108 107 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 155 Write 119 Mixed 77 SusWrite 108 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 157 154 156 156 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 151 Write 117 Mixed 70 SusWrite 155 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF Samsung... 384GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	88.5% Excellent	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 33.9 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	5x
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	4x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $234Bench 290%, 10,709 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GBSamsungBench 52%, 85 samples	4x
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hyn... 384GBSamsungBench 83%, 6 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16