Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181001
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 23:44
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 228
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 761
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,828
113% 1,828 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 88.3
Parallax 170
89% 123 fps
MRender 88
Gravity 120
Splatting 127
93% 112 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 94%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 75
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 63.7
61% 71.6 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 72
Splatting 71.1
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 169 115 114 92 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 500
Write 485
Mixed 399
SusWrite 150
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 35.6
126% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 202
190% 294 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 165 164 164 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 138
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 165
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01KF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 147 146 146 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 151
Write 137
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 146
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 96%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
90GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 26 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 125
Write 12.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 30
47% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback