ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '15 at 16:58
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 108 2-Core 193 70% 151 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 604 62% 498 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 59% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4788 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Lighting 43.7 Reflection 40.5 Parallax 50.8 36% 45 fps	MRender 51.5 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 37.5 34% 42.6 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 293GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 142 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 20 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 59 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 758065116	96.5% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 404 Mixed 414 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 40.7 135% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 93.5 102% 172 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 168 166 6575 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 28 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 132 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 19 (10) Unknown 0 200 13709446 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 22 (C2) HDA temperature 116 111 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	92.7% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 164 Mixed 159 121% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.29 116% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 752GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 58 (03) Spinup time 152 144 9375 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4653 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19397 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 561 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 109 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 159 159 123435 (C2) HDA temperature 117 88 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45% Average	Read 88.9 Write 68.1 Mixed 67.8 56% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.09 39% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 654GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 149 142 9516 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4718 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19371 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 577 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 117 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 141 141 178422 (C2) HDA temperature 114 86 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 208 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 199 202 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9 (C8) Write error rate 199 198 214	41.1% Average	Read 71.5 Write 71.4 Mixed 63.5 52% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.32 95% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 273GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 89629040 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 510 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 55 25790291136 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3756 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 194 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 65 45 30653808675 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 33 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 12011 (C2) HDA temperature 35 55 -140737488355293 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -114692806669756 (F1) Unknown 100 253 11772447427 (F2) Unknown 100 253 19028584160	81.7% Excellent	Read 141 Write 144 Mixed 126 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.22 67% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 191GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 138797480 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 460 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 57 8598145569 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3544 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 165 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 50 52095090721 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7058 (C2) HDA temperature 33 50 -140737488355295 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 34441342749363 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12810230253 (F2) Unknown 100 253 16817447714	63.9% Good	Read 121 Write 102 Mixed 108 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.22 72% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 129GB free Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 199 0 (03) Spinup time 173 165 6350 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4896 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8190 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1084 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 145 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4896 (C2) HDA temperature 107 70 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.2% Below average	Read 61.8 Write 60.3 Mixed 59 46% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.32 95% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 69%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 9GB free Firmware: PMAP Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 134 Write 26.8 Mixed 41.9 50% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.84 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.61 329% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	399x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	105x
Core i5-3570KIntel $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $890

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback