Asus B85-PRO GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '19 at 14:15
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 173 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 301 40% 303 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 255 591 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8620) 2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 6.92 Parallax 9.34 5% 7.63 fps	MRender 6.57 Gravity 7.17 Splatting 8.65 6% 7.46 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 100 38 34 79 31 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.7% Average	Read 242 Write 218 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 72.5 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 9.9 76% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 83.5 DQ Mixed 95.7 80% 119 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 846GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 182 179 181 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 169 Mixed 38 SusWrite 180 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1333C9-4GNS 0420 F3-1333C9-4GNS Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.9% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 14.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 1,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus B85-PRO GAMER - $504

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	227x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	203x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	151x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	157x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	141x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	59x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $927

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16