Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-C (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150706
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '19 at 07:15
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 481 50% 404 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 2619) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 0.47 2% 1.38 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 1.7 2% 2.01 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 152 167 167 167 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 154 Write 194 Mixed 77 SusWrite 151 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 67GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 57 65 65 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 113 Write 81.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 61.4 51% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 107%
FNK TECH USB CARD READER 32GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 17GB free, PID 0300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 13 13 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	8.74% Terrible	Read 16.2 Write 8 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 12.1 14% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 73% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.74% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston M471B5273DH1-CH9 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	109x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	77x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	117x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	51x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16