Inversenet FRONTIER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemInversenet FRONTIER  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H110M-SI01
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 02:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 147
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 313
32% 261 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 37.3
33% 36 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 35.8
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD10EZEX-00WN4A0 240GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 483
Write 427
Mixed 388
SusWrite 85.8
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 42
142% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 239
194% 274 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
161GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 131 130 129 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
69% Good
Read 111
Write 113
Mixed 66
SusWrite 129
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
7GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 4.7 4.8 4.8 5.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Read 34.8
Write 5.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.2
14% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown L316008G3C1128K04O 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FRONTIER Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Inversenet FRONTIER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $740
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback